skip to content rich footer

stevenclark.com.au

subscibe to the StevenClark.com.au rss feed

Le Camera Plastique

In a world where the masses carry high quality digital camera technology and there is an obsession with super crisp imagery it’s nice to shoot film using a simple camera obscura without distracting bells and whistles. All the better if the body is plastic and the lens is made of simple meniscus plastic.

Le Camera Plastique. An all-embracing term for lo-fi cameras like the Holga (designed in 1981) and its variants, the Diana and its more than fifty clones from the 70s, the newer revitalised Diana F+ and products sold by the lomo crowd and similar cheaply acquired photographic equipment that offer lens distortions, light leaks and film advance winders that sound like children’s toys. Often called toy cameras.

The go-to book on the subject is Plastic Cameras: Toying with creativity second edition by Michelle Bates but I’d also point you to read Pinhole Photography: From historic technique to digital application fourth edition by Eric Renner to fill out your understanding of simple photographic principles. And mostly because it’s also just a good book on photography in general.

We have three Holgas in the house (two 120N and a 120 PAN), but haven’t yet acquired any nice old Dianas or clones. However, as far as le camera plastique goes I think you’d have to agree the Polaroid Super Shooter Land Camera gifted to me by the ever-generous Film Photography Project meets the plastic camera definition. It doesn’t come more lo-fi than the Super Shooter and if you’ve ever had one in your hands you would understand exactly what I’m talking about – solid plastic body, plastic viewfinder, plastic lens & minimal (if any) real user controls. It takes Fujifilm pack film.

Some people will never like the abandonment that comes with shooting le camera plastique. But I’m one of the many who enjoy it immensely. For good examples you can look to Tim Hixson’s The Beach series or the beautiful Holga images of Michael Kenna.

If you’re really crazy about le camera plastique you can take these cheap cameras & mod them like the Holgaroid or turn them into pinholes. Le camera plastique is open to your own interpretation. That’s just another reason why it’s so much fun to get out there shooting lo-fi photography. Hell, make your own camera from scratch! Forget the rules.

models by night no. 5 shot with a Polaroid Super Shooter Land Camera & Fujifilm FP-3000B

Cannibal corpse shot on a Holga 120n using Kodak Portra 400

Comments are closed.

Social Networking

Keep an eye out for me on Twitter

About the Author

Steven Clark Steven Clark - the stand up guy on this site

My name is Steven Clark (aka nortypig) and I shoot film photography for fun. I have an MBA (Specialisation) and a Bachelor of Computing from the University of Tasmania. Currently in pursuit of investment for a local business venture. Dreams of owning the World. Idea champion. Paradox.

Morgan's Barn Mead

Non-commercial mead created from fresh Tasmanian apples and honey sourced within a 50 km radius (or closer). This artisan product is currently in the early stages of commercialisation. To learn more, visit Morgan's Barn Mead.

Photography

My photography is at Steven Clark Studio and my regular photo blog presents an ongoing stream of latest images at Walk a Mile in my Shoes.

Recently Reviewed Books

Site Supporters

Hosted by Brett Drinkwater at Tashosting who is always there at the other end of my every inconvenient question and technical crisis. Brett's local community support for us over the last five years is greatly appreciated.

skip to top of page

Currently Reading

On Being a Photographer by David Hurn & Bill Jay

It was inevitable that I'd pick up a copy of On Being a Photographer by David Hurn and Bill Jay because I enjoyed their other book On Looking at Photographs earlier this year. Because it's useful as an amateur photographer to gain a glimpse into the professional perspective of two good photographers that have a lot of credibility behind their work. I don't mean the photo-rock-star-guru speaking circuit credibility... phooey to that... I mean the working photographer credibility that comes with decades of serious practice. And what have I got to lose?