skip to content rich footer

stevenclark.com.au

subscibe to the StevenClark.com.au rss feed

Keep an eye out for me on Facebook and Twitter

Contracts 101 – Part 11: Possibility of Performance

Disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer and I have no claim that this advice should be taken as legal advice in replacement of seeking out professional help. What I hope to do is educate you over a series of small posts about what constitutes a contract and you should be able to figure out when you might need to see a real lawyer. Although this series is in the Australian context many of the principles apply in other countries.

Up until this point in the Contracts 101 series there has been substantial information at each step of the process of explanation of simple contracts. However, element five of the contract is often under-represented in our minds as to its importance.

Possibility of performance means the contract must be possible to complete because legally binding contracts cannot be undertaken to peroform an impossible act. This is not to say that an entrepeneur on hiring a contractor is going to be confronted at year’s end by the contractor stating that their sub-contractors had difficulties and there was too much rain in July. No, that does not constitute a barrier to possibility of performance in regards to the contract – more likely than not, such a situation would simply be mismanagement or bad luck. Neither of which the court is open to addressing as a get out of jail free card for businesses.

For impossibility of performance there must be no way in living hell that the contract could be achieved – for example, you could not legally contract somebody to remove a large stadium in a week if you knew full well that it could not be achieved in less than two weeks due to physical and process constraints. And you cannot contract people to locate and return an item or person that does not exist. The contract must be possible to complete, otherwise the court will not treat it as valid in the eyes of the law.

It is worth noting, were the impossibility of performance to arise following the point the contract is entered into then the contract would be considered frustrated and would usually be discharged. For example, were you to contract somebody to paint the Sydney Harbour Bridge but after the second week there was a disaster that destroyed the bridge – well, you can see the dilemma. No bridge, no possibiliity of performance = no contract.

In Contracts 101 Part 12 the discussion moves to the sixth and final element of the contract – genuine consent.

Note: Resources used for this series are identified in the first installment – Contracts 101 – Part 1: Outline.

Installments in Contracts 101

Comments are closed.

About the Author

Steven Clark Steven Clark - the stand up guy on this site

My name is Steven Clark and my passions are business, web development, photography and writing. My current CV [PDF 775KB] discusses relevant work history and interests. Currently I'm in the second half of a post-graduate university degree of MBA (Journalism and Media Studies) at the University of Tasmania.

Social Networks

Lo and behold I now happen to inhabit the realms of Facebook and Twitter so see you over there.

Photography

My fine art photography is available online at Steven Clark Studio. You may also enjoy my photo blog Walk a Mile in my Shoes.

Recently Reviewed Books

Site Supporters

Hosted by Brett Drinkwater at Tashosting who is always there at the other end of my every inconvenient question and technical crisis. Brett's local community support for us over the last five years is greatly appreciated.

skip to top of page
Currently Reading The Accidental Guerrilla by David Kilcullen

Late last year I watched an address to the Australian National Press Club from counter-terrorism expert and author of The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One , David Kilcullen. In that address he mentioned the period after World War 2 when, in retrospect, we had wars against colonialisation as countries pushed back against dominating forces. Similarly, when we look back at the current wars we’ll see them as wars against globalisation – people pushing back against the tide of world wide Americanisation and globalised culture. David Kilcullen is there to inform us that what the American government are group-labeling global terrorists are more often than not local insurgents with local concerns. Understanding this crucial point and unraveling the complexity of the enemy is crucial to America's success in the field.