skip to content rich footer

stevenclark.com.au

subscibe to the StevenClark.com.au rss feed

Keep an eye out for me on Facebook and Twitter

HTML 5, Ego and Design by Committee

This is an opinion piece about why I stopped bothering with the debate about HTML 5. Its fine to have contrary opinions, but the HTML 5 conversation is getting a lot of steam over on Jeffrey Zeldman’s site this week and its probably important that people all have their say. Whoever we are, wherever we are. We’re all stakeholders in these technologies.

On September 8, 2007 I wrote an article titled The Solution is a HTML 5 Apathetic Doctype which marked a point in my mindset. To a certain extent that article was tongue in cheek but it had a certain seed of truth within that made it clear to me the HTML 5 specification was always going to be about Hickson’s vision, whether that was the right or wrong vision made no difference.

Did I really want a HTML 5 Apathetic Doctype? No. What I wanted to say in that article is that dumbing down to meet the case study for Flickr, for example, is ludicrous. Its Flickr’s responsibility to provide a workable application, not a specification’s job to bend to meet the business model of third party developers. Why not just put a get out of jail free card into the specification and stop trying to fool anyone… but that’s just my opinion. I’ll continue to code XHTML 1.0 and deliver it as text/html until the cows come home, sometime in about 2030 at least (again tongue in cheek).

The really sad part of the HTML 5 issue is that if this turns out to be a dud then we’re using XHTML 1 and HTML 4 into the way, way future and we’ll have achieved zero. So Hickson better be more than sure that he’s pushed the right direction.

Needless to say, while the perception of the dual-committee specification development is that primarily this is Hickson’s vision and Hickson’s mission then its pointless trying to argue, suggest or debate. Bruce Lawson suggests that if we don’t vote we can’t complain about the government, but I’d suggest some governments don’t take kindly to criticism. So, like a lot of people, I have walked away from the entire conversation.

I’m glad Jeffrey Zeldman is mixing it up on his blog about HTML 5 right now because it all needs to be said. Now XHTML 2 is dead, we should be concerned about the HTML 5 specification.

Comments are closed.

About the Author

Steven Clark Steven Clark - the stand up guy on this site

My name is Steven Clark and my passions are business, web development, photography and writing. My current CV [PDF 775KB] discusses relevant work history and interests. Currently I'm in the second half of a post-graduate university degree of MBA (Journalism and Media Studies) at the University of Tasmania.

Social Networks

Lo and behold I now happen to inhabit the realms of Facebook and Twitter so see you over there.

Photography

My fine art photography is available online at Steven Clark Studio. You may also enjoy my photo blog Walk a Mile in my Shoes.

Recently Reviewed Books

Site Supporters

Hosted by Brett Drinkwater at Tashosting who is always there at the other end of my every inconvenient question and technical crisis. Brett's local community support for us over the last five years is greatly appreciated.

skip to top of page
Currently Reading The Accidental Guerrilla by David Kilcullen

Late last year I watched an address to the Australian National Press Club from counter-terrorism expert and author of The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One , David Kilcullen. In that address he mentioned the period after World War 2 when, in retrospect, we had wars against colonialisation as countries pushed back against dominating forces. Similarly, when we look back at the current wars we’ll see them as wars against globalisation – people pushing back against the tide of world wide Americanisation and globalised culture. David Kilcullen is there to inform us that what the American government are group-labeling global terrorists are more often than not local insurgents with local concerns. Understanding this crucial point and unraveling the complexity of the enemy is crucial to America's success in the field.