skip to content rich footer

stevenclark.com.au

subscibe to the StevenClark.com.au rss feed

Keep an eye out for me on Facebook and Twitter

Talent, Hard Work and Late Bloomers

Self Portrait with Soft Hat by Paul Cezanne, 1894Recently, The New Yorker published an outstanding article by Malcolm Gladwell titled Late Bloomers which I briefly touched on at the time in my own article On the Nature of Creative Genius. It’s a common perception in our society that artists, musicians and other creatives require natural talent. Picasso is a prime example, the young Picasso was a gifted and insightful genius of his day producing his first masterpiece at 20 – Evocation: The Burial of Casagemas.

However, contrast the genius of Picasso, a natural talent, to that of Cezanne. It was not talent that drove Cezanne to painting, it was a passion to paint. He lacked the talent of an illustrator and even at 30 he produced mediocre work. Cezanne’s first one man exhibition was at the age of 56 and only because Pissarro, Renoir, Degas and Monet iimplored Vollard to hunt down the relatively unappreciated Cezanne in the town of Aix. If it weren’t for that visit to Aix the work of Cezanne would have disappeared into history. The point is that Cezanne was a great example of hard work, of passion, of what Gladwell describes as the experimental genius who, over decades, works on their skill to become a master. And, Cezanne is the result of many layers of social support including family, sponsors and teachers who enabled his journey of passion.

Gladwell makes a point of asking what Cezanne’s career counsellor would have said had he been in high school in our times? I would shudder to think how many talentless people are steered to work in factories simply because they can’t draw for peanuts.

The question about talent and passion regularly crops up among designers, photographers and artists. Jin over on 8164.org is asking about talent versus hard work and whether natural talent exists? My take on that question is to suggest there is no doubt the phenomenon of natural talent exists, but talent is far from the whole ballgame. Talent without effort equals a wasted opportunity. So what is talent?

At the core of our makeup we are all slightly different. Someone may have a better physical ability to balance, or be able to hit balls consistently on a sweet spot, or find it a natural experience to map the external world through their fingers to meet two dimensional representations or interpretations. However, short of being posed with direct restrictive barriers, those talents might well be learned through hard work, experimentation and passion. Imagine the young Cezanne, a talentless artist who had no natural ability to draw.

Which brings me full circle to a bugbear of mine. For a short time I taught best practice web design to graphic arts diploma students and they repeatedly kept saying they were visual people. This somehow implied that I was outside the sphere of understanding design and that somehow being a visual person meant they were not expecting themselves to learn new skills like basic web standards coding. So here’s the short rant that I continually process…

You can be who and what you want in life. You choose every day to be who you are by all the small choices you make every minute and hour. Designers, I’d suggest you find out a little about markup and programming… and coders you need to start reading about design and getting yourself a few pencils and a sketchbook. Keep journals. My theory is that people get really good at the things they do a lot. People tend to do what they get recognition for doing well. It’s a circle. Plug into that circle. If you want to be a designer or coder or an architect or a movie director then make those choices. Would Cezanne’s life be any less valuable had his work rotted away in that attic in Aix? It’s about the journey, not recognition. If you have a passion without natural talent your reward is the painting or the crafting or the design itself. It’s like throwing a pebble in a well every day for a lifetime. Anyone can paint, but only a master can Paint. If that makes sense?

Your journey of passion might start with reading a book. Or sitting by the water with some conte crayons. And, if you get a chance, buy a dog and laugh a little.

One Response to “Talent, Hard Work and Late Bloomers”

  1. Translucent » Blog Archive » A question of talent

    [...] you follow the link to Steven’s website there is a good read about the discussion and his article links to others if you are interested in [...]

About the Author

Steven Clark Steven Clark - the stand up guy on this site

My name is Steven Clark and my passions are business, web development, photography and writing. My current CV [PDF 775KB] discusses relevant work history and interests. Currently I'm in the second half of a post-graduate university degree of MBA (Journalism and Media Studies) at the University of Tasmania.

Social Networks

Lo and behold I now happen to inhabit the realms of Facebook and Twitter so see you over there.

Photography

My fine art photography is available online at Steven Clark Studio. You may also enjoy my photo blog Walk a Mile in my Shoes.

Recently Reviewed Books

Site Supporters

Hosted by Brett Drinkwater at Tashosting who is always there at the other end of my every inconvenient question and technical crisis. Brett's local community support for us over the last five years is greatly appreciated.

skip to top of page
Currently Reading The Accidental Guerrilla by David Kilcullen

Late last year I watched an address to the Australian National Press Club from counter-terrorism expert and author of The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One , David Kilcullen. In that address he mentioned the period after World War 2 when, in retrospect, we had wars against colonialisation as countries pushed back against dominating forces. Similarly, when we look back at the current wars we’ll see them as wars against globalisation – people pushing back against the tide of world wide Americanisation and globalised culture. David Kilcullen is there to inform us that what the American government are group-labeling global terrorists are more often than not local insurgents with local concerns. Understanding this crucial point and unraveling the complexity of the enemy is crucial to America's success in the field.