<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Having Two H1 Headings is Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevenclark.com.au/2008/06/05/why-having-two-h1-headings-is-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevenclark.com.au/2008/06/05/why-having-two-h1-headings-is-wrong/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://stevenclark.com.au/2008/06/05/why-having-two-h1-headings-is-wrong/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenclark.com.au/2008/06/05/why-having-two-h1-headings-is-wrong/#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Or, lets put it this way...

Say you had two sections to your page... the content and the sidebar. OK say you put a H1 in the content section and a H1 in the sidebar. Is this somehow intended to give more Google emphasis to these headings...??

I mean, as opposed to simply having a H1 Page Heading with a H2 at the top of content area and a H2 at the top of the sidebar.

No matter which way I try to split the argument it really comes back to people just wanting to shout a little louder to Google through some construct like a logo or sidebar header. The information itself can always be marked up satisfactorily using a single H1 with sub-level H2 headings etc. I expect Google can interpret an appropriately set heading structure for its true meaning just fine that way without bending over to say "hey here's multiple [shouting] top level headings - way important! Don't miss my logo Mr Google".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, lets put it this way&#8230;</p>
<p>Say you had two sections to your page&#8230; the content and the sidebar. OK say you put a H1 in the content section and a H1 in the sidebar. Is this somehow intended to give more Google emphasis to these headings&#8230;??</p>
<p>I mean, as opposed to simply having a H1 Page Heading with a H2 at the top of content area and a H2 at the top of the sidebar.</p>
<p>No matter which way I try to split the argument it really comes back to people just wanting to shout a little louder to Google through some construct like a logo or sidebar header. The information itself can always be marked up satisfactorily using a single H1 with sub-level H2 headings etc. I expect Google can interpret an appropriately set heading structure for its true meaning just fine that way without bending over to say &#8220;hey here&#8217;s multiple [shouting] top level headings - way important! Don&#8217;t miss my logo Mr Google&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
