skip to content rich footer

stevenclark.com.au

subscibe to the StevenClark.com.au rss feed

HTML Email is a Marketing Conversation

Reading Roger Johansson’s post this morning – The Email Standards Project launches – its clear to see the Email Standards Project is gaining momentum. Nobody can argue that interoperablity of any technology is a bad thing. They can however argue that HTML email is not necessarily the right thing (read Matt Robin‘s comments on the WaSP post). Yes HTML email is here to stay and yes there would be some sanity in having it render across email clients consistently. Yet I’m left with these nagging questions of my own about the marriage of web standards and HTML email. Something just feels uneasy about having the web standards movement suddenly condone, even via the back door, the use of HTML email.

Who sends HTML email? Let me put it this way then – do normal everyday people send HTML email to each other? No?

So to some extent the conversation about HTML email and the Email Standards Project is actually a marketing one. As opposed to a standardista one. HTML email is a marketing tool which could be made more efficient for marketers and business people to get their corporate message out there complete with branding. I can see from a marketing perspective that this is a good thing. Contact means potential leads and it translates to revenue.

I just think to some extent this relationship between HTML email and marketing is either understated in the conversation or so implicit in it that it might be missed. Not by Mathew and the guys who are passionately focused on bringing this to the fore though, I mean overlooked by some who would simply go with the first intuitive answer that interoperability is never a bad thing in itself.

In other words I think what I’m suggesting is this isn’t really a web standards conversation. Its a marketing conversation. Its a conversation perhaps between web developers who might work for marketers who want to create HTML email brochures.

Which then brings me back to the uneasy relationship between HTML email and SPAM. Now isn’t that like me fixing the robber’s gun while he rifles through my wallet? Why does this company, for example, want to send me HTML email? Just a question.

I think this is a good point to be asking questions if we’re going to be allied significantly as standardistas to the HTML email conversation. Just my 2 cents.

One Response to “HTML Email is a Marketing Conversation”

  1. steven

    I’d missed the part about the Email Standards Group actually being the software developers at Freshview, creators of Campaign Monitor.

    Just in case you weren’t aware this isn’t an altruistic grass roots movement to yada yada… y’know. But actually a business doing their business… y’know. Well I guess y’know. :)

Social Networking

Keep an eye out for me on Twitter

About the Author

Steven Clark Steven Clark - the stand up guy on this site

My name is Steven Clark (aka nortypig) and I shoot film photography for fun. I have an MBA (Specialisation) and a Bachelor of Computing from the University of Tasmania. Currently in pursuit of investment for a local business venture. Dreams of owning the World. Idea champion. Paradox.

Morgan's Barn Mead

Non-commercial mead created from fresh Tasmanian apples and honey sourced within a 50 km radius (or closer). This artisan product is currently in the early stages of commercialisation. To learn more, visit Morgan's Barn Mead.

Photography

My photography is at Steven Clark Studio and my regular photo blog presents an ongoing stream of latest images at Walk a Mile in my Shoes.

Recently Reviewed Books

Site Supporters

Hosted by Brett Drinkwater at Tashosting who is always there at the other end of my every inconvenient question and technical crisis. Brett's local community support for us over the last five years is greatly appreciated.

skip to top of page

Currently Reading

On Being a Photographer by David Hurn & Bill Jay

It was inevitable that I'd pick up a copy of On Being a Photographer by David Hurn and Bill Jay because I enjoyed their other book On Looking at Photographs earlier this year. Because it's useful as an amateur photographer to gain a glimpse into the professional perspective of two good photographers that have a lot of credibility behind their work. I don't mean the photo-rock-star-guru speaking circuit credibility... phooey to that... I mean the working photographer credibility that comes with decades of serious practice. And what have I got to lose?